-
Website
http://artofmanliness.com -
Original page
http://artofmanliness.com/2008/07/23/is-being-a-stay-at-home-dad-manly/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Marisa Duma
2 comments · 2 points
-
vanderleun
2 comments · 137 points
-
Alison_H
4 comments · 1 points
-
Corey
15 comments · 2 points
-
jurisnaturalist
3 comments · 23 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Hey caveman! In the modern world women can earn more than a man. It has only been since your type have been able to let a woman out of a kitchen that this could occur. I think that a man can be satisfied at home building a sweet ass organic garden, raising chickens for eggs and slaughter, and still get dinner on the table. It depends on what you choose to fill your day with. Being at home can leave you to do more manly activities than slowly dying behind a computer, you can create with your hands like REAL men do!
More manly than many things commonly considered manly, in my book.
You surrender so many things to be Mr. Mum, for a job that doesn't pay and you are likely to get ridiculed for, all to look after your kids properly.
Exactly! There is so much at home that could occupy you in cool ways.
I'd love to meet a professional and setup my own aquaponics system for organic food, work in the garden, look after the kids and house. There is no reason in this day and age why such a thing is unacceptable(except perhaps men can't breastfeed, heh)
But let's not ignore a man's genetic disposition and drive that is quite different than a woman's. It is not better or worse, just different.
I never believed this until we had a child of our own come into our lives. There is simply something genetic in a woman's makeup that equips them better for the nurturing and upbringing of a child. Working around the house is manly, but being a stay at home caretaker of a family is a different question.
so far in my own life, the only kid we have has four legs and barks, but I am for all intensive purposes a stay-at-home Dad/ househusband. aside from feeding and walking the our dog, I have many tasks I complete to improve our house, handle finances, organize and eliminate clutter, and other manly things to improve the quality of life for my family.
Zendad
http://www.zendad.net
In my life, Dad's "whatever it takes" philosophy has meant working multiple jobs and/or hard labor jobs (I've been very fortunate in the danger department). But it has also meant being a stay at home dad. My wife and I have both been the stay at home parent, usually to support the other one while they attended college. There have been times in our life together when it just wasn't possible for the second parent to get a job that paid enough to have any money left over after daycare, so it was smarter economically for one of us to stay at home.
I'm won't lie: for me, being a stay at home dad was a soul crushing, ambition killing experience. I understand very well the defeated, "unmanly" air discussed in earlier comments, and preventing that from happening to you can be a daily challenge in that situation.
But you know what? My awesome, very manly father did his share of soul crushing, ambition killing work to take care of me. Tearing your body up on manual labor to build houses, waking up in pain every morning and knowing that if you died at 40 the coroner would find the body of a 70 year old--soul crushing. Being a long haul truck driver, away from your family for a minimum of a week at a time, endless days on the road to the point that you can barely remember what state you're in, seeing and hearing about your co-workers being beaten, stabbed and/or shot for their cargo, their truck, or just the 30 bucks in their wallet -- soul crushing. But he did it anyway. Even though it was hard, even though it was miserable, he what was necessary to take care of us until he found or made better options.
If I can at all help it, I won't do the stay at home thing ever again. But if we find ourselves in a situation where my staying at home is the best available option and any other choice would mean depriving my children, I'll do it again in a heartbeat.
Let's say our "SAHD" gets the kids up at a regular time and has food prepared for breakfast. He has the kids help clean, then he engages them in activities and learning lessons throughout the day. He feeds them a nutritious lunch, runs errands, and has the kids do assigned chores. Dinner ready for when the wife comes home, and final chores before bedtime. Having a scheduled, disciplined day for himself and the kids makes his job busy, challenging, and -- in this instance -- manly.
The other side of the coin is the SAHD who lets his kids sleep as late as they want. He lets them pour their own cereal while he plays his video games. He goes to McDonald's every day for lunch, and his wife comes home to a messy house and has to cook dinner herself. This is a loser, lazy lifestyle and definitely not manly. He probably wouldn't be married -- and thus a SAHD -- long.
I'll go ahead and vote yes. I agree with above comments that being a man means doing whatever it takes to make sure your family is secure. If your wife makes enough money to ensure the whole family lives a comfortable lifestyle, then by all means. However... I do agree with Dirk above that gender roles are well ingrained into our makeup. I do believe that men will yearn for a certain amount of displayable success. It's not about being a "caveman" as another poster put it. It's just an evolved fact of our existence. A man will need some secondary pursuit in order to fulfill this need.
I don't think that it's unmanly at all if it's the right thing for your family. There are situations where it makes a lot more sense for Dad to stay home for the good of the family as a whole.
And as a stay-at-home mom I can sure relate to the soul-crushing aspect of it- I adore my kids and wouldn't make another choice (well, I couldn't anyway as they have special needs), but it can be extremely isolating and routine if you're not very careful to also give yourself options to feel like something other than "just" a parent.
That said, I think that the men who do manage to be great stay at home dads are fantastic (and in my experience, are usually doing a great job at it)- I think that it's a lot more difficult for stay at home dads than moms in some ways. SAH Dads don't have the theoretical support that SAH moms do...there aren't a lot of Daddy and Me playgroups, and I can't count the number of Dads I've seen at the park with their kids in the morning who are alone as so many moms won't talk to them for whatever reason. If you can deal with all of that, and kids, then you really are a "real" man.
I agree with what you say about gender roles developing that way for a reason, and the stereotypes you mention (e.g. women are nurturing) are accurate when talking about society in general. But there are two problems. First, the degree to which these stereotypes apply to each individual family varies widely. Second, it's not all or nothing. The fact that a woman works doesn't mean she has no time for nurturing, or the fact that a man stays at home doesn't mean he can't "get out there and use his talents." An ideal family is one in which some roles are more solidly defined, but there is an ample amount of sharing.
Maybe you guys just aren't as nurturing as your counterparts. Seems to me you're generalizing based on your personal experience with your kids (which I have no doubt has been a positive one for both you and yours).
@ TJ
Right on all counts, dude.
http://www.the-common-man.com
Although I'd probably find something to do with myself still; blogging is one, but likely some kinda telecommutable type of role, that I can do at home...
Btw, I have the topic for the next poll! Which is also very related to SAHD and its stereotype!
Come on over...
If a woman leaves her home to take on a job, then that's just not very womanly. If she's forced to because her husband isn't making enough to support the family, that's not very manly. If he really is working his very hardest and trying his best but life situations are just keeping him from providing fully for his family, thus forcing his wife to take on a job as well...well, that happens.
Say, in this scenario, the wife just so happens to start making enough money to support the family all on her own, but not enough to pay for a babysitter in addition to everythijng else and the husband has to stay at home and take care of the kids. In that situation, it would be very manly to step up to the plate and do what you have to do to take care of the family. This should ony be a temporary arrangement, however, and they should continue to try to work it out to where the wife can get back in the home and the man can get back to work, because that's the way that it is supposed to be.
I fully appreciate Angelina's comments above when she brought the insight that women won't respect their husbands if the roles were reversed and the husband stayed at home while the wife went to work.
Sure, every family has to figure out what will work best for them. Sometimes both husband and wife have to work to make ends meet. But, if given the choice, the man should work and the wife should maintain the home. This is the way it always has been and always should be. I will always absolutely resist anything that tries to reverse, or change, the roles of the husband and wife.
So, given the context, it can be very manly for the man to stay at home, but this situation should be avoided if possible.
Dudes, just go to work, come home and be manly dads.
Stereotypes aside, I think that some gender roles are divinely appointed, and I do believe that a man's role is to protect and provide for his family. I believe that a woman's role is to nurture the family.
Now, that's the ideal. There are plenty of circumstances that warrant going outside of this ideal. If a man loses his job and the wife must work, I think a temporary shift in duties could be in order.
There are a multitude of possibilities, but in the end it's all about your relationship with God and with each other. If you feel it is right for your family, then it probably is, despite what others say.
@Thomas- You raise an interesting point about men leaving the home after the Industrial Revolution. For thousands of years before then, most men stayed at home. They either worked as farmers or artisans. Of course every now and then they would leave for hunts or wars, but for the most part they stayed at home to work. Consequently, men were able to play a bigger role in their children's lives. For example, a man before the Industrial Revolution would teach their son the value of hard work by taking them to the fields or to his shop.
One of the interesting ramifications of the Information Age is that the internet with its remote working capabilities might return us back to pre-Industrial home arrangements.
Maybe if he practiced cage fighting or was a writer it would be different, but in my opinion he is just lazy and was ruined by a mom who did EVERYTHING for him and a wife who puts up with too much s&*t.
I'd personally hate staying home. I used to have my son every Saturday while my wife worked, but I'm just not wired for that. I love my kids and relish my time with them, but I'm accomplishment/goal motivated and my career is intellectually stimulating in a way that I have never gotten from staying home with the kids. I'm much more comfortable in the "leader/coach" role with kids. Whether it's coaching baseball or taking my kids on a hike and teaching them about nature, I feel like I have more to offer them since I have a pathological lack of empathy my sense of "nurturing" centers on protection and being a provider.
In terms of having the guts to do what's best for your family, in a given situation, then yes it is.
In terms of the "what will my wife think of me" department, hopefully you married the right woman.
In terms of how you raise your kids, That depends on how you do it... Ive seen 40 year old men who are more childish with rasing their children, and I've seen way too many kids either abused or coddled/overprotected. Raising your kids in a manly way means giving them freedom to learn their own lessons, while taking enough precautions to ensure they are smart enough to learn them withoud getting hurt too bad. It also means a healthy amount of discipline, and ensuring your kids know why they've been disciplined. One should always use spanking as a last resort, as it really offers no educational value or severity if used frequently.
Use it for things where your child endangers their own personal safety-"That car you almost ran into would hurt a lot more than my spanking - DON'T CROSS THE ROAD WITHOUT LOOKING, AGAIN". Find other ways to punish your kid for misbehaving in public, swearing, etc.. And never, ever be the father who says "It couldn't have been my kid" when a teacher, or other adult you have given charge of your kid to... It's ok to ask for proof. But sometimes kids do dumb/stupid/cruel things, and your kid is no different..
But, yeah, it all depends on your point of view if it is manly or not.... Manly is as much in the mindset of the man as is how he performs the task he set out to do.
In fact, it's just about the most difficult job a person can take on...there's the isolation, and the constant need to remind yourself that what you're doing is actually beneficial. It's easy to lose that...you feel like you're pulling some sort of scam. If you don't take pride in EVERYTHING you do during the day, and see it's inherent purpose, you'll lose yourself. Take pride in a clean house. Take pride in reading to your kids and watching them learn. Take those few quiet moments you have and learn something new. Be sure you're completely involved in all financial decisions, even if you aren't chipping in monetarily.
Relatedly, I highly recommend anyone who takes this path join a gym, and use the membership daily. You've spent your entire day caring for someone else. Take an hour and take care of yourself. Blow off steam...aside from feeling better, you'll avoid the spread that will inevitably come along with being at home, and you're wife will get off on it. Believe me...
So in my long, roundabout way, my answer to the question is this...if you approach it with the same pride as you approached your job, then it is.
And on a greater note, if you worry about whether other people think what you're doing is manly or not, then you're not one...being a man means not giving a flying F*** about what others think.
To my detractors:
As long as he’s not being lazy: Anyone who thinks there is anything lazy about staying at home with the kids is crazy! It is a lot of work to take care of a child. I was on maternity leave for only six weeks, and I was glad to return to work because I wanted a break from being a full time mom.
Gender roles have been there for thousands of years are there for a reason: This was true. The thing you have to remember is our culture moves quickly and the rules change. There was a time when it made sense for the woman to stay at home with the children. She has to recover from giving birth, she had to breastfeed the child, and men made more money. But with the advent of bottles, formula, breast pumps, maternity leave, and the ability at earn as much as a man, there really is no reason for these gender roles to be so rigid.
Men have ambition and need to work outside of the home to fulfill that ambition: This is all fine and well except it implies that women do not share this same ambition. More and more, we are seeing women rise to the top of their field- in all areas. There are now more women in college than men. It’s about time that we ask men to make the same sacrifices that women have been expected to make for years.
Women are more nurturing: This is probably the best argument, but it still has some problems. First, it depends on what you consider nurturing to be. As Wayne points out, perhaps turning our kids into germaphobes, and making play dates isn’t the best definition of nurturing. From what I can tell, the only thing that would make women (as a whole) more “nurturing” is that they are more adept at language (both verbal and non-verbal) and more empathetic (probably due to being able to read people better). But does this really equate to being more nurturing? If you have a child that is constantly getting into trouble, isn’t better to discipline the child (typically a dad behavior) than to emphasize with the child? The other problem with this argument is that it speaks of women as a whole not individually, so it will undoubtedly fail in certain situations. Case in point: Britney Spears.
The vast majority of women could not respect their man if he stayed home making domestic daddy while she hacked it through the corporate world: Perhaps this is true for the older generation, but from what I’ve seen from the younger generation (including myself) this does not prove true. It seems to be about even.
and the only women who prefer this situation are control freaks who want agreeable beta males that defer to their power: actually giving up ultimate power over how the children (the most important thing in most mom’s lives) are raised seems the exact opposite of control-freak.
Being a stay at home dad is fine, but your first responsibility is to provide for your family. If you can meet those needs, then yes it's manly to spend your extra time with your family.
Taking care of business, is manly.
secondly the idea that aman is not as nutruring as a woman is a myth. the augument that "conditioning" has made men porly equipt to work with children is true only in the sence that "western culture" has foold itself in to thinking that.
And lastly as a male infint todaler teacher, I fermly beleve that men helping children to grow up strong, helthy, and well ajusted, is the most punk rock thing a man can do!
No children yet, but I would have taken care of them, and done it gladly, because I know fathers are important.
I agree with Carl, men can raise kids, and should be more involved with their children. That's manly.
Physiologically and psychologically, men are as capable of taking care of children as women. I do say that with one exception. Based on my reading and experience around kids that this is only true once the child is done breast feeding. There are clear developmental benefits for a child to breast feed and be with the mother for at least a year but probably two years. After that though, pop can be the equal of mom in child rearing.
The whole issue of whether or not being a SAHD is manly or not is more of an ideological abstraction than anything else. Where the rubber meets the road in the real world, people will do what is best for themselves and their families, even if that means breaking some arbitrary social convention. If what works for one family is for daddy to stay home and take care of the kids then that is what they'll do.
I don't really care whether or not anyone thinks I'm manly because I stay at home with my three year old. The fact of the matter is that it makes sense on a number of levels for me to be the one staying at home. We want one of us to be the person that raises our child. We have no family closer than 12 hours away. One of us has to be at home and my wife's income is quite comfortable. I cannot command that sort of salary. Whether or not staying at home is manly is the least of my concerns. We live well and my daughter gets good care. Period. Space. Full Stop.
Here is some information about me:
Eagle Scout, Former Marine Corporal and 81mm Mortar squad leader, professional craft brewer, every lawn/yard tool I own runs on "man" power (reel mower, scythe, axe, crosscut saw etc) with the exception of my grandpa's chainsaw, I smoke a pipe daily, I've been hot lather shaving since before it was trendy, I hunt, I fish, I've slaughtered and butchered pigs, I've worked in warehouses, a brewery, and as a carpenter's helper. I've been a stay at home dad for two years.
And the fact that you don't care what anyone says about your decision speaks volumes about the kind of man you are, Travis. Good on you, brother.
It seems to me that anyone who believes that the "natural order" is for the man to work and the woman to stay at home because they think "that's the way it's always been" and will resist any changes to the larger society (not to your own lives, of course; I mean, that's the point, do what you gotta do and what is right for your family) has an extremely narrow view of the world and of human history. And trying to hold on to an idealized past that never really existed will only disappoint you.
I voted yes and heres why. I run the house like I ran my department in the cabinet shop where I worked until my diagnosis. The kids and I all have responsibilities that must be done each day. I have a garden that I tend which helps me "provide" for my family while my wife looks for ways to take up the slack financially. I still do what I can to maintain my "manliness". I work on the van when needed, change the oil in my truck and teach my sons and daughter to do it too. I fix the plumbing, build the chicken coop, cut firewood... all the manly stuff I used to do around here, when I can. I also teach the kids the things that they will need to know to get along in the world as we homeschool too. I don't do these things to be "manly", I do them because they need to be done and it has fallen to me to do them.
I think that men can provide for their family in the home or at work and not be manly. They can gossip around the office or shop, or sit at home and play video games or surf the internet and neglect their responsibilities or they can step up to the plate and try their level best to hit the ball every time. Each day that we are given, we have to decide what we want to make of ourselves. I know men who talked a big talk but weaseled out of their child support payments, and I know men who have reenlisted in the National Guard knowing full well that they would be leaving their families to perhaps make the ultimate sacrifice. They each made a choice that day when they got up. The later surely seems to me to be the more manly, and I guess it all boils down to being responsible for you and yours.
I'll pass the soap box on now...
I have four options:
1. Make myself miserable by staying home with kids all day (not so good for kids)
2. Not have kids (best for the environment)
3. Get a nanny (ok option)
4. My partner/husband stays home with the kids and I do the work I love (good for kids, me and, as long as partner was into it, for him too).
Is it unwomanly NOT to want to stay home with kids or not want kids? I don't think anybody except crazy Christian-right people would say I'm less of a woman for loving my work, so why should a man be less manly for wanting or needing to stay home with kids?
Staying at home with small children takes a certain kind of personality- one that I DO NOT have. If my husband or partner does, then he should do the job. As modern adults we should do what we're good at, and what we love, if not, what was the point of all our forefathers and foremothers working so hard for equality, worker's rights, etc. Certainly not to blindly imitate their tough lives.
Let's all open our minds to the infinite ways we can all be human! I was raised by a very progressive community and I can say I'm the sanest person I know because of it. Subvert the dominant paradigm!
If you're a woman and can't respect that, you're crazy.
Raising children well and keeping the house in order is often harder and more draining than going to the office, fooling around with MineSweeper and internet porn, then having a leisurely lunch break and maybe checking some email after if the boss is watching. Those of you who have seen SAHDs all drained and "soft", please remember how many trapped housewives in the 50's were on Valium to escape from their oppressive lives! This is not a gender-exclusive thing. Staying at home is tough all over, and not everyone, male or female, can take it.
I actually know of more than one woman who recently divorced her husband because he not only expected her to care for the kids and keep the house clean, but to feed, clothe, and practically wash him too when he got home from work! (One guy's contribution to childrearing was to spend maybe half an hour playing with the kid as long as the kid was clean and in a good mood, then handing the kid off to mom if it started getting disagreeable...) They said it was like having one more very big kid. Not very manly at all, I'd say.
i was workin, bring home most of the bacon and my work was not really making sense anymore and wasn't very condusive with our new addition to the family. I was in retail management making about 60k a year. not to shabby for not having a college degree.
we came up with a plan that would take a lot of sacrifice : for the season. I was gonna take care of our son and go to school!
my wife is in a great position in marketing with a lot of opp. to grow. so we made the move. shoot, if you snagged up a good lady that's doin in out there in tha real world and she's makin it . its ok to let her do her thing...
here you go: who's gonna raise your son to grow up to be a man? daycare??? I don't think so...sometimes it takes MORE of a man to step up to the plate and do the dirty work...to get your team (family) where you want it to be . its easier to stand back and just work than do to something SO different.
it takes alot for someone who has never even had a father to step up to the plate and take one for the team. (someone who has no clue what to expect)...i can only be what I would have wanted... if yoU have the strength to do and be not what you have seen or didn't have... I have learned more about patience, gentleness, and love in the past 10 monthes than I ever have in my life. these things make you A REAL MAN!!! but to say to lose manliness over a lifestyle change makes you less manly. PLEASE. ITS TAUGHT ME TO HOW TO BE A REAL MAN !!!!
Is it manly to work til odd hours of the night and have children who don't know you? Not in my opinion.
Sometimes during the day, I'll be playing tea time with my daughter. Some times I'm playing GI joes with my son. Other times I'm baking cookies for school functions. In my free time I'm at the shooting range or helping friends and neighbors with projects from sewing to rebuilding engines.
Does this make me more or less" manly" at times? according to gender roles, yes. But, we don't follow gender roles here. I like to sew. I like box at our local gym. I like to bake cookies and make nice healthy meals for my babies and my wife.
I've never cut our lawn. My wife loves it. Its her "job" here. My wife has never cooked one meal in 14 years. I've done all the cooking. She has no clue how to fix a rip, let alone make an entire outfit from scratch. She taught me how to change brakes.
Is this not manly or womanly? probably not. But, people who don't like our lifestyle can push off. Most people who have wuestioned it have been told their opinion doesn't matter, and if they kept going, we disowned them. This includes a mother and father in law and two brothers. Its none of their business how we run our lives. We make more money on a single income by double than they do as a working couple but somehow they feel the need to lecture.
Anyhow, if you're worried about it being "manly" my advice is to worry about how YOU feel about it and tell all the others to piss off.
nuff said.
Don't forget, gentlemen, that the "genetics" you speak of when you speak of women being more "nurturing" is not exactly the case. From a scientific perspective, I'll assume you mean "hormonal," because it is hormones that drive women and men's behavior patterns, not genes.
(Also, try telling Amazon women that they are more nurturing than men. They'd probably cut your leg off.)
Consider this: hormones are different in everyone. Some women have more testosterone than the average man, some men have more estrogen than the average woman. I think the notion than women are somehow "better" at parenting than men is not biological at all: it's cultural. It's left-overs from a time when baby formula didn't exist. Think about it: it made sense for women to stay home with their children if that was they only way the infants could eat. But today, it's quite easy for men to feed their children, and that's probably one of the main reasons we're seeing an increase in stay-at-home dads.
Don't you think it's a teensy bit sexist to say that men crave accomplishment, and not diaper-changing, while simultaneously assuming that women do not crave accomplishment, and aspire to a job that men so eagerly discard (read: raising children and keeping house)?
All-in-all, I'm really pleased to find out that stay-at-home dads are "manly." I just hope that career-mothers are still considered "womanly"
I feel I did a good job, when I take care of the children all day, do the laundry, dishes, keep the house clean. I also work on ebay to bring home some extra cash. Since that has not been working lately, I will more than likely find a part time job on the weekends, and possibly nights.
It's hard when certain people in your life feel you need to "get a job" to be a lazy bum. All that does is cause a rift in your family. Hello mother in law. My mom thinks it great, my mother in law thinks I am a lazy bum.
This role reversal discussion is all nonsense and annoying it is the only bad part of staying home, the moms and there endless questions.
The few that hit on it were right in that, doing what is best for the kids is manly, sacrifice is manly, walking the walk that I talk is manly.
I was taught family first, I did when I deployed in the infantry, I did when I chased bad guys, and now I do it when they need me home.
If I or any of the other SAHDs make you uncomfortable get out of my area of occupation. I think ultimately we will have a very positve influence on our kids, their education system and 9-5 lives that have been overly feminized for so long especially if you have boys.
My guys want, to play ball and win Not TIE every time, they want to use tools, Not crafts and beads, but I would let them do whatever and Mom wouldn't. The traditional rolls only matter to women, I just do what I MUST as did all the men I knew.
Is there anyone here who wants to tell a disabled military vet that staying at home to take care of his kids is not manly? I doubt it. There are a multitude of reasons for a dad to stay at home and raise his children. My father-in-law, who is also a disabled vet, stayed at home and when our son arrives next march, so will I. Did I plan my life this way? No, absolutely not. My wife and I had an agreement - whoever was making the least would leave work and stay home with the kids whenever we decided to start a family. In this case, my health decided for us. Anyone who says that it's unmanly (John Hagee - kiss my ass) had better sit down and think about the answer. Assuming that all stay at home dads are a bunch of lazy losers is not only insulting to vets like me and my father-in-law, but an insult to every man on the planet who decides that he'd prefer to raise the kids than sit behind a desk 8 hours a day. Which is manlier - teaching your kids or wasting away at an 8 to 5? If I had my way, not only would I be an at-home dad, but my wife would also be an at-home mom. Too many studies have shown that kids with an at-home parent are not only better adjusted, but that they also do better in school. Now, pass me my black apron with the skull and crossbones on it and get out of the way - I've got dinner to make.
It is always manly being responsible and taking care of your family in what ever role is necessary.
IMO I think it is most certainly manly to do what ever it takes to ensure that your family is provided and cared for. TJ's comment was very close to how i view it. If that means you staying at home while the mother works than so be it.
BUT, if you asked me to do it voluntarily so that the mother could pursue other interests I would find myself HIGHLY reluctant to do so. I think that I would find being a stay at home dad and fulfilling the traditional roles of caretaker, teacher, maid, cook, party organizer, home decorator etc. I would go nuts. I would find this to be "soul crushing" work for me. I really believe that for me to keep my sanity in such a situation I would drop the "maid, cook, party organizer, home decorator" aspects and end up fulfilling both provider and caretaker roles. I would end up either finding a part time job, or finding ways to provide more for the familly such as building furniture in the garage, farming, programing, etc. stuff that can be done at home or while the kids are in school. Or at the very least going to school building for a "better" career.
I think that the reason women landed the role of "caretaker" throughout history is simply because they had the child to begin with, and there is never a guarantee that the father will be there when the child arrives.
I don't know how to post questions here but i suppose the real question should be:
"is it manly to plan and become a stay at home dad when you first start your family while your wife goes to work?"
Thanks for reading...Happy Fatherhood!
E
With that in mind, I told him that I would consider it if he were willing to be a sahd.
I make more than him, but not by much. However, we did the math and after all of the childcare expenses of us both working, the extra income would only really bring $1500 a year that wasn't spoken for in childcare and other associated bills etc.
I have been with my company longer and Dustin is just a more parental type than I am. While I love our now 4 year old, I would never has considered being a stay at home parent, I don't have the patience. So, while it was slightly controversial in our small town, neither one of us regret our decision. Our 4 year old is now in pre-k, so he has gone back to work, but at the time, it was the best for our child and our marriage. A man that can do that, is the most manly thing ever to me and i never lost respect for him even though I was the one in the workforce.
So, is it manly? Heck yeah! I totally believe that my husband has the more difficult job. It takes discipline to manage your time, energy, and resources without having to report to a boss. It takes creativity to keep an infant entertained while getting the house cleaned and preparing meals. It takes strength to cope with the isolation, since there are few (if any) established ways for SAHD's to meet up. It takes courage for him to go against the social norm (even stronger in our religion) and do what's right for us. I believe discipline, creativity, strength and courage are very manly characteristics!
I also don't believe I am any less womanly for being the bread-winner. My husband brings my baby to the office for my lunch break so I can nurse him and spend time with him, then I care for him at night while my husband finishes dinner and then goes to the gym. I am the one who is up all night with the baby, who bathes him and sings to him, and I spend every moment with my son on the weekends. I feel very connected to my baby still, and I feel safe knowing he's well-cared for in my absence.
One other note--I HATE the term Mr. MOM!!!!!!! IT IS SO DEGRADING!!!!! I am still the mother, and my husband cannot take my place as the mother simply because he is a SAHD. Likewise, he's all DAD. He's fulfilling his fatherly role by providing a safe and comfortable home, which doesn't diminish his title of DAD. Please, people, realize that calling someone Mr. Mom is sexist and offensive. It is even worse to say he is "playing" Mr. Mom!
Dirty dishes, dirty landry, dirty house. You have worked all day, can not make ends meet. Short on paying bills all the time. A second income is needed badly.
I'm not married, but I stumbled on to your blog, and I have to say, that I think that a stay at home dad is very sexy..having said that, is the real problem of whether or not staying at home manly? No. The real problem is finding a work life balance that both the mother and the father can rely upon. Why can't one stay home for one year with the kid, while the other work, then perhaps switch when the kid is 2? How about finding an arrangement when the kid is old enough for daycare?
Work-life balance is the most important, and even if women are more nurturing, most women don't want to give up on their careers permanantly. Look at Japan, their birthrate is lower than the States, and it is more male-dominated. The men work 11 hour shifts..is THAT manly?? The women are discriminated against in the workplace after becoming pregnant. If there is a way to balance out work-life family, then do it.
this in not what i think but what i saw